Skip to main content
deleted 5 characters in body
Source Link
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 118
  • 253

Hello, I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does $q^{d(\sigma,\tau)}$ where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above.

Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho MatsumoMatsumoto called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals."

Hello, I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does $q^{d(\sigma,\tau)}$ where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above.

Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho Matsumo called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals."

I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does $q^{d(\sigma,\tau)}$ where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above.

Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho Matsumoto called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals."

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Gjergji Zaimi
  • 85.6k
  • 4
  • 236
  • 402

Hello, I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does q^{d(\sigma,\tau)}$q^{d(\sigma,\tau)}$ where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above. Another

Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices.""Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho Matsumo called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals." Sorry this is my first time on Math Overflow and I haven't yet learned how to link papers."Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals."

Hello, I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does q^{d(\sigma,\tau)} where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above. Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho Matsumo called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals." Sorry this is my first time on Math Overflow and I haven't yet learned how to link papers.

Hello, I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does $q^{d(\sigma,\tau)}$ where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above.

Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho Matsumo called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals."

Source Link

Hello, I really think it helps to think about the entries of this matrix does q^{d(\sigma,\tau)} where d denotes the distance between two permutations on the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by the set of all transpositions. In this light you can compare the determinant you're interested in with the one computed by Don Zagier in his article "realizability of a model in infinite statistics." In that paper, Zagier computes the analogous determinant corresponding to the Cayley graph of the symmetric group generated by adjacent transpositions (i.e. the Coxeter generators). This is a very different geometry on permutations but Zagier finds a similar factorization showing that the determinant has roots on the unit circle. Zagier's result is based on a clever factorization in the group algebra, just like the factorization into JM elements discussed above. Another point of view on Zagier's result, relating it to hyperplane arrangements, is explained in Stanley and Hanlon's article "a q-deformation of a trivial symmetric group action." Also, if you want to see similar results in the context of the Brauer algebra, you should look up Paul Zinn-Justin's paper "Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices." I saw that a user above posted a link to my Phd thesis - I was young and foolish then and more polished versions of those results have since appeared in a paper written jointly with Sho Matsumo called "Jucys-Murphy elements and unitary matrix integrals." Sorry this is my first time on Math Overflow and I haven't yet learned how to link papers.