Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 15, 2012 at 9:35 vote accept Bob Solovay
Feb 15, 2012 at 9:29 history edited Stephen S CC BY-SA 3.0
add another example
Feb 15, 2012 at 9:05 comment added Stephen S @Bob Solovay: Yemon Choi's definition of the one-point compactification is correct. @Yemon Choi: But your second comment is wrong, since $\mathbb{Q}$ has infinite compact subsets (e.g., any convergent sequence together with its limit forms a compact set). But every compact subset of $\mathbb{Q}$ has empty interior, so it's true that every neighbourhood of the point at infinity meets every non-empty open set.
Feb 15, 2012 at 3:48 comment added Yemon Choi Thus, if I have understood things correctly: when we give Q its subspace topology from R (thus not locally compact) we find that the open neighbourhoods of the point at infinity correspond to cofinite subsets of Q, and hence they meet every non-empty open subset of Q. (Open subsets of Q in this topology are either empty or infinite.)
Feb 15, 2012 at 3:46 comment added Yemon Choi @BobSolovay: I was not sure of this myself, but consulting Kelley's book tells me that for any top. space X the 1-point compactification X* has as its open sets all the open subsets of X, together with all subsets of X* whose complements are closed compact subsets of X. (TBC)
Feb 15, 2012 at 2:21 comment added Bob Solovay I don't know what you mean by "the one point compactification of Q". Of course, I am familiar with the one point compactification of a locally compact space. What is the topology of this space. What are two points that don't have disjoint neighborhoods?
Feb 14, 2012 at 11:38 history answered Stephen S CC BY-SA 3.0