Timeline for Generalized silver matrix (related to defining number)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2012 at 4:27 | vote | accept | mathlove1357 | ||
| May 9, 2012 at 13:29 | answer | added | Gjergji Zaimi | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 9, 2012 at 9:10 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | Looks like the problem appears here: ams.org/notices/199709/people.pdf Still no idea what is the defining number so more elucidation is necessary. | |
| May 9, 2012 at 8:24 | comment | added | Alexander Chervov | what are K_m and "defining numbers" ? | |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 11:25 | comment | added | mathlove1357 | (7,6). It looks possible, but I don't know the answer. | |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 8:37 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | If you want to prove it for all such m and n, then presumably you can prove it for some particular values of m and n. Which is the smallest pair for which you do not yet know the answer? | |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 8:12 | comment | added | mathlove1357 | I want to prove this conjecture for all $m\neq n$. | |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 8:03 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | What is the smallest value of $\max(m,n)$ for which you don't know the answer? | |
| Feb 12, 2012 at 8:02 | history | edited | mathlove1357 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2012 at 3:03 | history | asked | mathlove1357 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |