Timeline for Trace Determinant [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2012 at 19:51 | history | closed |
Angelo Andreas Blass user9072 Gjergji Zaimi Harry Gindi |
too localized | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 18:38 | answer | added | Jon Bannon | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 16:26 | comment | added | Angelo | I opened a meta discussion on this question. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 15:12 | comment | added | Angelo | $\mathop{\rm Det} (A^i) = (\mathop{\rm Det} A)^i$. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:45 | vote | accept | Turbo | ||
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:26 | comment | added | Marc Palm | I guess the OP was searching for $f( Tr(A), Tr(A^2), \dots ) =Det(A)$ | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:22 | answer | added | Michael Stoll | timeline score: 16 | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:12 | history | edited | Turbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:10 | comment | added | Turbo | Ok I think you guys misunbderstood Now I see. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:09 | comment | added | Angelo | Of course there can't be such an $f_n$, and if you had actually understood what Florian told you would see it. I voted to close. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 14:04 | comment | added | Turbo | But is there an explicit $f_{n}$ and $g_{n}$ for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$? | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 13:55 | comment | added | Florian Eisele | What do you mean by "convert"? Obviously there can be no function such that $f(Tr(A))=Det(A)$ or $g(Det(A))=Tr(A)$ for all matrices $A$, since one can prescribe values for both trace and determinant simultaniously. | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 13:41 | history | asked | Turbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |