Timeline for Quasi-dense subsets of boolean algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2012 at 0:16 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | It's a surprisingly difficult question! | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 21:20 | comment | added | Monroe Eskew | Thanks, Joel. Maybe some idea here can help in the atomless case. | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 4:46 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | I have now posted a counterexample to the implication among atomic Boolean algebras. Perhaps it could be used to construct an atomless counterexample, but I don't see it yet. | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 4:43 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1290 characters in body; added 15 characters in body
|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 4:34 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Full counterexample; added 4 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body; added 6 characters in body; deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:57 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Oh, sorry, I misread the question. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:36 | comment | added | Monroe Eskew | But I said $B$ was dense in $C$, not just quasi-dense. This was not a typo. Also, I am only really interested in the case of atomless algebras. I will put that in the original question. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:33 | comment | added | Goldstern | The question was about "$B$ dense in $C$", not just quasi-dense. | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:21 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |