Timeline for Terminology for certain monoids which are to monoids like fields are to rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2021 at 8:44 | answer | added | Emily | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 16, 2017 at 20:13 | comment | added | k.stm | @MartinBrandenburg You referred me here in this question on math stackexchange a long time ago and I just stumpled upon it again by chance. I just wanted to inform you that I have started to privately call them “stereoids” and “division stereoids” half-jokingly. | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 15:18 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | @Martin: point taken. | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 15:11 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | @Dan: This is not compatible with the usage of pointed objects (ncatlab.org/nlab/show/pointed+object). | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 14:52 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | what about "pointed abelian group"? | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 14:39 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 266 characters in body; edited body
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:46 | answer | added | Benjamin Steinberg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 20:01 | answer | added | James Cranch | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 17:44 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | It would help to elaborate on the condition M*. For all I know, it looks like a submonoid with (a different) zero. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2012.02.09 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 17:19 | history | asked | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |