Timeline for Can every manifold be given an analytic structure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2022 at 9:47 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced the link to the arXiv front end; see https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/5124/is-it-time-to-replace-links-to-the-ucdavis-arxiv-frontend
|
| Sep 24, 2021 at 7:29 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @Lee I've fixed the link to Kapovich–Millson | |
| Sep 24, 2021 at 7:28 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed arxiv front-end link
|
| Jun 22, 2019 at 18:09 | history | edited | Lee Mosher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 51 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2019 at 18:03 | comment | added | Lee Mosher | Regarding Q2, I believe that the Kapovich--Milson paper referred to is "Universality theorems for configuration spaces of planar linkages", Topology 41 (2002), no. 6, 1051–1107. I've added a link to that paper in the answer. | |
| Feb 1, 2018 at 17:45 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | @timur: there are a variety of answers to your question. The most tautological (and perhaps least informative) one is that the Kirby-Siebenmann obstruction lies in $H^4(M; \mathbb Z_2)$, and for manifolds of dimension three or lower, that group is always trivial, so the KS invariant can only be zero. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| May 16, 2016 at 17:10 | comment | added | timur | Is it true that the Kirby-Siebenmann smoothing obstruction vanishes in dimensions 1, 2 and 3? | |
| Jan 5, 2015 at 5:43 | history | edited | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Appended a more complete history of related problems. Comments by Riccardo Benedetti.
|
| Dec 13, 2009 at 20:04 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| Dec 13, 2009 at 20:03 | history | answered | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |