Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 20, 2022 at 13:45 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Removed title from tooltip, per @TheAmplitwist's request (https://mathoverflow.net/questions/8776/statistics-of-irreps-of-s-n-that-can-be-read-off-the-young-diagram-and-conseque/8778#comment1086942_8778)
May 20, 2022 at 13:41 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
While this is on the front page, name of article for one article; name of author for another
S May 20, 2022 at 13:22 history suggested The Amplitwist CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed broken link to springerlink.com
May 20, 2022 at 12:16 review Suggested edits
S May 20, 2022 at 13:22
Dec 13, 2009 at 19:59 history edited Greg Kuperberg CC BY-SA 2.5
added 769 characters in body
Dec 13, 2009 at 19:43 comment added Greg Kuperberg I suppose that you're right; my answer is overconfident. My guess is that the boundary does and doesn't cause trouble. I would be surprised if the integral isn't the truth, but it may take more work to show that the fluctuations at the boundary are predictable enough for convergence.
Dec 13, 2009 at 19:38 history edited Greg Kuperberg CC BY-SA 2.5
Extended answer based on Fomin-Lulov paper
Dec 13, 2009 at 19:34 comment added JSE I thought about this last night and got a bit confused, actually. You might expect that log(dim chi)/sqrt(n) would, with probability 1, lie in a smaller and smaller band around some constant C obtained by an integral, as you say. But I'm not sure this is actually the case; in a later paper, Kerov and Vershik show this quantity is very probably bounded between c_1 and c_2, so it can't be an immediate consequence of their theorem that it approaches a limit. I think maybe the stuff near the boundary with highly negative log-hooklength causes trouble?
Dec 13, 2009 at 18:21 history answered Greg Kuperberg CC BY-SA 2.5