Timeline for Norm functionals of $B(H)$ restricted to sub ven-Neumann algebras [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 7, 2012 at 21:55 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Just for anyone who reads this later: my initial comment and suggestion of math.stackexchange.com, and Jochen Wengenroth's answer below, were based on an older version of the question, which was much more basic than the current one. In its current form, I think the question is one which could have been fine on either MSE or here on MO. | |
Feb 6, 2012 at 18:01 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | Dear Mahmood, I still think this is not a suitable question for MO. But please ask it over at Stack exchange, and someone (e.g. me) will answer it... | |
Feb 6, 2012 at 16:44 | comment | added | Mahmood Alaghmandan | I had forgotten to mention a sub von Neumann algebra of $B(H)$. | |
Feb 6, 2012 at 16:43 | vote | accept | Mahmood Alaghmandan | ||
Feb 6, 2012 at 16:43 | |||||
Feb 6, 2012 at 16:42 | history | edited | Mahmood Alaghmandan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 29 characters in body; edited title
|
Feb 6, 2012 at 15:03 | history | closed |
Yemon Choi Andrew Stacey Matthew Daws Bill Johnson Mark Meckes |
too localized | |
Feb 6, 2012 at 10:13 | answer | added | Jochen Wengenroth | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 6, 2012 at 7:52 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
tweaked LaTeX, added tag
|
Feb 6, 2012 at 7:43 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Mahmood, what you describe is the weak operator topology, as opposed to the weak-star topology or the weak topology on B(H). You should probably ask this question on math.stackexchange.com instead | |
Feb 6, 2012 at 6:56 | history | asked | Mahmood Alaghmandan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |