Timeline for Reference request: Simple facts about vector-valued Sobolev space
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 31, 2017 at 17:26 | history | suggested | user14319 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
notations fixed
|
| Jul 31, 2017 at 16:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 31, 2017 at 17:26 | |||||
| S Jul 18, 2013 at 18:14 | history | suggested | András Bátkai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
mathjax fixed
|
| Jul 18, 2013 at 17:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 18, 2013 at 18:14 | |||||
| Feb 6, 2012 at 17:42 | vote | accept | Nate Eldredge | ||
| Feb 5, 2012 at 20:53 | answer | added | András Bátkai | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 19:08 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Keep it unless a referee or editor makes you take it out. You won't regret it. | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 18:38 | answer | added | TaQ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 15:43 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | @Deane: That's what I have in my current draft, and it was a good exercise, but the appendix is half as long as the paper itself. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 11:37 | comment | added | Deane Yang | I think this is a rather common situation in PDE's and analysis, because there are so many slight variants possible but it is often difficult to identify the right general formulation that covers them all. Whenever I encountered this, my solution was to write out careful statements and proofs of what I needed and put them all into an appendix of my paper. | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 22:30 | answer | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 22:09 | history | asked | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |