Timeline for explanation on a scheme which is not affine scheme
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2012 at 8:18 | vote | accept | K1. | ||
| Feb 4, 2012 at 9:43 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 31 | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 9:30 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | I think "Hausdorff" here means "separated". | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 0:56 | answer | added | Charles Staats | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 21:45 | comment | added | James Cranch | One way to do this is to observe that an affine scheme is separated, but this scheme is not separated. | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 21:44 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Many affine schemes are not Hausdorff. | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 21:41 | comment | added | K1. | Is that only because it's not Hausdorff? | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 21:39 | history | asked | K1. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |