Timeline for Nicest coset representatives of the symplectic group in the general linear group
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 12, 2009 at 19:36 | comment | added | David Bar Moshe | I meant the circular symplectic ensemble (not the circular clasical ensemble). Anyway, I hope that the above remark clarified the matter. | |
Dec 12, 2009 at 19:27 | comment | added | David Bar Moshe | Sorry that I haven't given more detail. I meant quaternionic matrices where each element is a complex quaternion: a 1 + b i + c j + d k , where a, b, c, d are complex numbers. Now, this parameterization is not new, a similar parameterization is used in the circular classical ensemble, with an additional constraint of unitarity. There, the coset representaties are self dual quaternionic matrices with an additional unitarity constraint. | |
Dec 12, 2009 at 16:31 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | This is not correct, I'm afraid. The $n\times n$ quaternionic matrices are in one-to-one correspondence with $\mathbb{H}$-linear endomorphisms of $\mathbb{H}^n$, whereas $2n \times 2n$ complex matrices are in one-to-one correspondence with $\mathbb{C}$-linear endomorphisms of $\mathbb{C}^{2n}$. Although as complex vector spaces $\mathbb{H}^n \cong \mathbb{C}^{2n}$, $\mathbb{H}$-linearity is a strong condition. Consider $n=1$. A $1\times 1$ quaternionic matrix is a quaternion, which is 2-dimensional over $\mathbb{C}$, whereas a $2\times 2$ complex matrix is 4-dimsensional over $\mathbb{C}$. | |
Dec 12, 2009 at 15:46 | history | answered | David Bar Moshe | CC BY-SA 2.5 |