Timeline for Kato's log motives
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2010 at 20:06 | comment | added | Zoran Skoda | To SC: I am among new members in MO and tried to be acive in last couple of weeks. It is a great resource. But I can say that the often-seen police statements against the questioners are what makes me double think wheather to help this community or freeze my activity. For example this question makes perfect sense to me. It gives some pointers to specific sources. It is pretty unambigous Q to anybody who knows a bit both about either motives or log schemes. For those who don't the COMBINATION is hopeless to attempt if we need to start as far as what is log geometry. Google would do better. | |
| Oct 18, 2009 at 12:11 | history | edited | Thomas Riepe | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added explanation of curiosity on that
|
| Oct 18, 2009 at 0:03 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | It would help the rest of us if you expanded the text of your question. For example, you might like to tell us a little about motives without log structures, or log structures on varieties over a field. Also, instead of just pointing to a talk and asking for notes, you could start with something like, "Kato gave a talk on motives and log motives. Could someone tell me what one is and why one would study them?" | |
| Oct 17, 2009 at 21:39 | history | edited | Ben Webster♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2009 at 18:46 | comment | added | Thomas Riepe | If someone has slides of that talk by Kato or notes explaining what "log motives" are, I'd be happy if I could read them. Of course I would be equally happy for any other explanation. | |
| Oct 17, 2009 at 18:11 | comment | added | David Zureick-Brown | What does your second sentence mean? | |
| Oct 17, 2009 at 12:01 | history | asked | Thomas Riepe | CC BY-SA 2.5 |