Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

fix dead link
Source Link
edit approved Sep 1, 2023 at 21:53
Greg Sadetsky
edit approved Sep 1, 2023 at 21:53
Greg Sadetsky
  • 103
  • 4

Please note that the Tu and Fischbach analysis was challenged - I don't know of these concerns are valid. See below

Refutation of claims such as “Pi is less random than we thought”. George Marsaglia Professor Emeritus Florida State University

http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0601001.pdfhttps://web.archive.org/web/20160303171837/http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0601001.pdf

Please note that the Tu and Fischbach analysis was challenged - I don't know of these concerns are valid. See below

Refutation of claims such as “Pi is less random than we thought”. George Marsaglia Professor Emeritus Florida State University

http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0601001.pdf

Please note that the Tu and Fischbach analysis was challenged - I don't know of these concerns are valid. See below

Refutation of claims such as “Pi is less random than we thought”. George Marsaglia Professor Emeritus Florida State University

https://web.archive.org/web/20160303171837/http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0601001.pdf

Source Link
Kimo Crossman
Kimo Crossman
  • 51
  • 1
  • 1

Please note that the Tu and Fischbach analysis was challenged - I don't know of these concerns are valid. See below

Refutation of claims such as “Pi is less random than we thought”. George Marsaglia Professor Emeritus Florida State University

http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0601001.pdf