Timeline for Two implicit references in Serre's *Groupes de Galois : le cas abélien*
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jan 17, 2012 at 13:42 | vote | accept | Chandan Singh Dalawat | ||
| Jan 15, 2012 at 11:53 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | Franz, Mattuck quotes Artin as saying that Then I showed it to the other number theorists, but they all laughed at it, and I remember Hasse in particular telling me it couldn't possibly be true. | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 9:58 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 9:51 | comment | added | Franz Lemmermeyer | After reading just the questions, I immediately thought "Samuel" and "Hasse". As for the second, I do not think that the plural is justified: Artin published his reciprocity law in 1923, and at that time, only a couple of mathematicians had studied Takagi's work. The ones I can think of are Artin, Hasse, Hecke, Siegel, Fueter, Furtwängler. | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 6:15 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | If I meet him, I would. In the meantime, it would be interesting to hear from MOers who know the history of number theory in the 20s. | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 5:27 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Can't you ask him? | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 5:13 | history | asked | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |