Timeline for Question regarding contiguous forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2012 at 22:06 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Sorry to hear that. You really need to buy some books. Here is a review with several other useful items in its bibliography, ams.org/bull/2004-41-04/S0273-0979-04-01018-3/… and here is the page for the Martinet book itself springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-3-540-44236-3 | |
| Jan 12, 2012 at 19:57 | comment | added | Kap | No I don't, so I'm just trying to find things online. Do you know any good paper online describing this? As far as I see it, the contiguous forms of a perfect form (vertex) $Q$ are vertices of the Ryshkov polyhedron that are neighbours to $Q$. Is that correct? | |
| Jan 12, 2012 at 19:42 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Do you have the Martinet book yet? | |
| Jan 12, 2012 at 18:34 | history | asked | Kap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |