Timeline for Semiclassical explanation of "Structured" spaces [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2010 at 5:57 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Harry Gindi | ||
| Jan 8, 2010 at 7:52 | vote | accept | Harry Gindi | ||
| Dec 11, 2009 at 7:03 | comment | added | Anton Geraschenko | Do you want this question deleted or just closed? | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 6:53 | history | closed |
Harry Gindi Anton Geraschenko |
no longer relevant | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 4:50 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Could a moderator close this post? I guess the question wasn't good. | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 4:19 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 4:14 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 192 characters in body; added 18 characters in body
|
| Dec 11, 2009 at 4:08 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | I still don't understand why you don't say "ringed space" or "locally ringed space". One can indeed consider modules over a (locally) ringed space. Not coherent modules, in general, but modules. Moreover, I don't understand the first question: precisely what WHAT? | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 4:00 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Yes, but the point is that the ring becomes "part of" the space, in that we can consider modules over the structure sheaf. | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 3:55 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 110 characters in body; added 25 characters in body
|
| Dec 11, 2009 at 3:51 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | I do find your question vague at the moment. Let's start at the beginning: by "structured space" do you mean "ringed space" as in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locally_ringed_space, or something else? | |
| Dec 11, 2009 at 3:41 | history | asked | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |