Timeline for On prime numbers [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2013 at 11:51 | history | edited | user20174 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 3, 2013 at 7:58 | vote | accept | user20174 | ||
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:05 | vote | accept | user20174 | ||
| Feb 3, 2013 at 7:58 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2012 at 12:25 | history | closed |
Bill Johnson Henry Cohn Dan Petersen David Loeffler Pietro Majer |
not a real question | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 8:53 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | note: acually neither limit is a series; they are certain asymptotic averages, so it is already not surprising that the result is somehow independent from the sequence $p_j$ | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 8:21 | history | edited | user20174 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 47 characters in body; deleted 105 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jan 9, 2012 at 8:10 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Then edit the question so you don't ask for a proof: "The question is not merely to prove the above result..." | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 7:52 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Eric Naslund's answer seems to show that, contrary to the title of your question, the phenomenon is a property of any sequence obeying certain growth/sparsity conditions, and hence is not really about the prime-composite distinction | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 6:38 | comment | added | user20174 | No, not a proof as I have one but a reference to similar work would be more helpful. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 6:26 | history | undeleted | user20174 | ||
| Jan 9, 2012 at 6:26 | history | deleted | user20174 | ||
| Jan 9, 2012 at 5:44 | answer | added | Eric Naslund | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 5:37 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | The question would be better with the imperative 'prove that'. You are asking a question, not setting homework. If you are asking for a proof, ask for it. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 5:23 | history | asked | user20174 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |