Timeline for Is a profinite group with a finite number of simple quotients and Jordan-Hölder factors finitely generated?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 9, 2012 at 21:46 | vote | accept | Maurizio Monge | ||
Jan 9, 2012 at 17:59 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correction
|
Jan 9, 2012 at 0:01 | comment | added | YCor | If $S$ is any nonabelian group $S^n$, the diagonal embedding of $S$ is not a normal subgroup! Hint: for $n=2$, compute $(g,1)(h,h)(g,1)^{-1}$... In a finite product $\prod_{i\in I}S_i$ of nonabelian simple groups, the only normal subgroups are the $\prod_{i\in J}S_i$ for $J$ ranging over subsets of $I$. It's an easy verification. | |
Jan 5, 2012 at 19:43 | comment | added | Maurizio Monge | I think that I'm missing something... in $S\wr{}G=S^{|G|}\rtimes{}G$, isn't the subgroup of $S^{|G|}$ formed by vectors with equal components a normal subgroup? In the case of $S$ elementary abelian the normal subgroups are exactly the sub-representations, why in the case that $S$ is non-abelian there should be no invariant subgroup? If $S$ is replaced by $S^{m_n}$, furthermore, all elements of $(S^{m_n})^{|G|}$ tuples with the first component equal (of the $m_n$) appears to be invariant under $G$. | |
Jan 5, 2012 at 0:01 | history | edited | Alain Valette | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jan 4, 2012 at 23:55 | history | answered | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |