Timeline for Riemannian Hausdorff distance between two conjugacy classes in a compact Lie group
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2016 at 20:50 | history | edited | John Jiang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2016 at 20:50 | vote | accept | John Jiang | ||
| May 5, 2012 at 2:59 | comment | added | John Jiang | @Anton, I guess it depends on how you put a Riemannian metric structure on the orbit space right? | |
| Jan 5, 2012 at 3:55 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | @John, the projection to the orbit space of isometric group action is always an submetry. | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:58 | comment | added | John Jiang | +1 for appeal to deity. | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:26 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | $DEITY, now Lipschitzness!... :P | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:24 | vote | accept | John Jiang | ||
| May 5, 2012 at 3:01 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:24 | comment | added | John Jiang | I guess your claim that $f$ is a submetry can be proved by Lipschitzness of the exponential map at every point on $U(n)$, which in turn can be proved by Baker-Hausdorff lemma. Is this how you think about it? | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:21 | comment | added | Anton Petrunin | arxiv.org/abs/0909.4650 | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:16 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Do people really say submetry? | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 6:14 | history | answered | Anton Petrunin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |