Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 3, 2012 at 23:55 history edited Jorge CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 12 characters in body
Jan 3, 2012 at 22:57 history edited Jorge CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 183 characters in body
Jan 3, 2012 at 22:53 comment added user17945 I agree with Ryan, though, this isn't really an appropriate question for this site.
Jan 3, 2012 at 22:52 comment added user17945 There's quite a bit wrong here. My suggestion would be to write everything in coordinates: $q^i=h^i(y),\ \dot{q}^i = \frac{\partial h^i}{\partial y^m}\dot{y}^m,\ \ddot{q}^i=\frac{\partial h^i}{\partial y^m}\ddot{y}^m+\frac{\partial^2 h^i}{\partial y^n\partial y^n}\dot{y}^n\dot{y}^m$. Substitute this into $M(q)\ddot{q}+N(q,\dot{q})=u$, multiply everything by $J$, and massage what you get into the form $\hat{M}(y)\ddot{y}+\hat{N}(y,\dot{y}) = \hat{u}$. Your assumed transformation of $\hat{M}$ is correct, but $\hat{N}$ is way off (and $\hat{u}=J u$).
Jan 3, 2012 at 22:51 comment added Jorge Ryan i'm not sure what you mean by motivation. From my end, my motivation is very clear: i'm doing research in nonlinear control & robotics and i'm investigating a very specific thing (the application of a specific map $q=h(y)$). However, tensorial analysis is not strong point and i'm not really sure about the last three equations. I could rephrase the question with a very specific argument: does the inertia tensor and the Coriolis vector transform this way? However in order to provide a background, i've elaborated on the whole thing!
Jan 3, 2012 at 21:50 comment added Ryan Budney Do you have a motivation? From the way you've written your question, it appears you're meandering around in a textbook and manipulating expressions, looking for people to tell you whether or not you've made a mistake. MO is generally for more focused questions, rather than "please check my argument for errors" type requests.
Jan 3, 2012 at 18:00 history asked Jorge CC BY-SA 3.0