Timeline for Values of Dirichlet L-funcions at natural numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 at 12:13 | vote | accept | emiliocba | ||
| Jan 4, 2012 at 9:26 | answer | added | Franz Lemmermeyer | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 4, 2012 at 0:56 | answer | added | Timothy Foo | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 3, 2012 at 18:12 | answer | added | Micah Milinovich | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jan 3, 2012 at 17:39 | answer | added | Stopple | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 3, 2012 at 17:31 | comment | added | Robert Kucharczyk | Also note that you have the equality $L(s,D)=\zeta_K(s)/\zeta_{\mathbb{Q}}(s)$, where $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{D})$. Hence at least for even $s$, you may equally well ask for values of the Dedekind zeta function. Siegel has shown long ago that $\zeta_K(s)$ is a rational number for negative odd $s$, which should give you strong arithmetic information on $L(s,D)$ for positive even $s$, via the functional equation. | |
| Jan 3, 2012 at 17:27 | history | edited | emiliocba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 3, 2012 at 17:19 | comment | added | Robert Kucharczyk | In the last two sentences, you probably mean $s$ instead of $n$. | |
| Jan 3, 2012 at 17:14 | history | asked | emiliocba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |