Timeline for How about the Lie algebra over commutative ring?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2011 at 0:17 | comment | added | Peter May | Just thank you to Qiaochu Yuan and Shripad. Answer has been edited. | |
| Dec 26, 2011 at 23:41 | history | edited | Peter May | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Associative is of course what I meant. I apologize
|
| Dec 26, 2011 at 17:34 | comment | added | Shripad | He perhaps means it to be `associative'. | |
| Dec 26, 2011 at 5:19 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Are you sure you want $A$ to be a commutative $R$-algebra? | |
| Dec 25, 2011 at 22:45 | history | answered | Peter May | CC BY-SA 3.0 |