Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link
  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property can be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available here. See also this questionthis question.

  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property can be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available here. See also this question.

  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property can be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available here. See also this question.

added link
Source Link
Fred Rohrer
  • 6.7k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 44
  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property willcan be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available in due timehere. See also this question.

  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property will be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available in due time. See also this question.

  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property can be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available here. See also this question.

Source Link
Fred Rohrer
  • 6.7k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 44

  1. A ring has ITI with respect to an ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ if and only if it has ITR with respect to $\mathfrak{a}$.

  2. A ring does not necessarily have ITI with respect to an ideal of finite type. (Note that the ideal in Quý's example is not of finite type.)

  3. A ring that has ITI with respect to every ideal of finite type does not necessarily have ITI with respect to every ideal.

Proofs of the above, concrete examples, and further details on the ITI-property will be found in a joint work with P.H.Quý (who gave the accepted answer), available in due time. See also this question.