Timeline for Is there a version of the valuative criteria for separateness/properness for varieties?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 15, 2021 at 9:12 | comment | added | Jérôme Poineau | How do you know that you can restrict to the case where $K$ is a one-dimensional function field over $k$? | |
Oct 21, 2009 at 1:31 | vote | accept | Joel Kamnitzer | ||
Oct 21, 2009 at 1:31 | vote | accept | Joel Kamnitzer | ||
Oct 21, 2009 at 1:31 | |||||
Oct 19, 2009 at 5:29 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added idea for slicker proof
|
Oct 18, 2009 at 2:25 | comment | added | Greg Stevenson | Added the argument I had in mind. | |
Oct 18, 2009 at 0:39 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added sketch of proof for my claim
|
Oct 17, 2009 at 13:06 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 22 characters in body
|
Oct 17, 2009 at 12:55 | comment | added | Greg Stevenson | I don't know of a place where it is explicitly written like this. A reference for the birational models of curves corresponding to finitely generated transcendence degree 1 extensions of the base field is Hartshorne I.6. | |
Oct 17, 2009 at 12:43 | comment | added | Joel Kamnitzer | This is the kind of answer I was looking for... do you know a reference? | |
Oct 17, 2009 at 7:43 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
statement was slightly too strong, fixed it
|
Oct 17, 2009 at 5:39 | history | answered | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |