Timeline for Can the relative count of the primefactors in $\small \lim_{w\to\infty}\prod_{k=1}^w (p_k-1) $ be determined analytically?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2012 at 11:03 | comment | added | Timothy Foo | Oh, thanks very much! If there is more to say about the general case, I'll let you know! | |
May 11, 2012 at 17:56 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | I'm "accepting" the answer because there has been no more activity for a long time. Your derivation is helpful anyway and I'll try to generalize it. Thanks for your input! | |
May 11, 2012 at 17:53 | vote | accept | Gottfried Helms | ||
Dec 22, 2011 at 2:06 | history | edited | Timothy Foo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added condition
|
Dec 20, 2011 at 17:48 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | Hmm, thank you for your input - I'll need a certain time to digest this. I was approaching the problem using little Fermat/Euler's totient function (and the connection to geometric series for the infinite case) but, for instance, was unsecure, what effect the higher fermat-quotients would introduce- they should "lift" the sums of primefactors q - but their occurences have no simple formula. Well, such effects should vanish if w goes to infinity (if their occurences are finite), but we do not know this (that was one of the main reasons, that I looked into experimental heuristics at all) | |
Dec 20, 2011 at 10:43 | history | edited | Timothy Foo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correcting phrasing
|
Dec 20, 2011 at 9:37 | history | edited | Timothy Foo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed math
|
Dec 20, 2011 at 9:26 | history | edited | Timothy Foo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
backticks
|
Dec 20, 2011 at 2:46 | history | edited | Timothy Foo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed math
|
Dec 20, 2011 at 2:35 | history | answered | Timothy Foo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |