Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 20, 2011 at 22:01 comment added zroslav Molev's paper has it's own minuses. I'll read now Molev's book and I hope that this book is much more better (I don't think however that Molev's paper is very bad: he stated lots of interesting that made Yangians much more clear for me - this survey was the second source about Yangians I read, the first was Molev-Nazarov-Olshanskiy paper)
Dec 20, 2011 at 21:48 comment added zroslav @Alexander: Oh, no: Molev didn't write about what I asked. Also Olshanskiy's paper about it is much better (for me) than Molev's survey. For example I still don't know how to check the first equality in this survey in the way that Molev said (if you know how to prove this identity in universal enveloping algebra in this way - let me know). Instead of that I read Olshanskiy's paper where he proved this (in another way).
Dec 18, 2011 at 17:00 comment added Alexander Chervov Many things written about Olshankii's construction, there is nice survey by A. Molev arxiv.org/abs/math/0211288 and it is discussed there section 2.13 page 19. There is also book by Molev with the same name. Molev's texts are usually well-written.
Dec 17, 2011 at 18:19 vote accept zroslav
Dec 17, 2011 at 15:13 history edited zroslav CC BY-SA 3.0
field
Dec 17, 2011 at 14:25 answer added George McNinch timeline score: 5
Dec 17, 2011 at 14:24 answer added Vladimir Dotsenko timeline score: 7
Dec 17, 2011 at 14:14 history asked zroslav CC BY-SA 3.0