Timeline for Why are Jucys-Murphy elements' eigenvalues whole numbers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 at 7:27 | comment | added | Igor Makhlin | Thanks for the typo. Yes, this proof was definitely inspired by their paper. And yes, as one can see from this question, they made an unexpected choice of statements to be left unproven. | |
| Dec 16, 2011 at 7:05 | history | edited | Igor Makhlin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2011 at 3:12 | comment | added | darij grinberg | "is a an eigenvalue" is a typo. This argument is very much in the spirit of Okounkov-Vershik, but way simpler than what they are doing (then again I might be misunderstanding them; the paper is not among the most readable...). For a representation theorist, it is a very natural argument. | |
| Dec 15, 2011 at 4:19 | history | edited | Igor Makhlin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2011 at 3:52 | history | answered | Igor Makhlin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |