Timeline for Are injective Omega-spectra the S-local objects of symmetric spectra for some class S?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2009 at 12:51 | history | edited | skupers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
changed title
|
| Dec 10, 2009 at 8:47 | vote | accept | skupers | ||
| Dec 10, 2009 at 8:31 | answer | added | skupers | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 17:18 | answer | added | Tyler Lawson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 15:54 | answer | added | Mark Hovey | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 13:29 | history | edited | skupers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
replaced S with a better candidate
|
| Dec 9, 2009 at 13:28 | comment | added | skupers | Yes, in fact example 3.1.10 doesn't work when you define S to be the class of level equivalences, because the lambda used there is not a pi_*-isomorphism, but all level equivalences are. | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 13:14 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | You said "...where S is the set of level equivalences." Do you mean S is the set of stable equivalences? | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 12:50 | history | asked | skupers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |