Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 14, 2011 at 12:47 vote accept Sh4pe
Dec 12, 2011 at 19:41 comment added Ben Webster I meant the endomorphism space. This is finite dimensional since any $\mathfrak{g}$-module map between objects in category $\mathcal{O}$ is determined by what it does on finitely many weight spaces (those which appear as highest weights in composition factors) and the space of vector space maps between those weight spaces is finite dimensional. For example, any endomorphism of a Verma module sends the highest weight vector to a highest weight vector, and thus is scalar multiplication.
Dec 12, 2011 at 17:33 history edited Ben Webster CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Dec 12, 2011 at 16:20 comment added Sh4pe First of all: thank you very much! That helps me a lot! But do you mean that my module itself is finite dimensional? One typical example would be a verma module, and they are in generally not finite dimensional. Or do you mean that the endomorphism spaces are finite dimensional? If true, why are they finite dimensional? (The merely linear endomorphisms of a verma would also form an infinite dimensional space). I'm not at all trying to argue with you, just trying to learn. Thank you!
Dec 12, 2011 at 16:14 vote accept Sh4pe
Dec 14, 2011 at 12:47
Dec 12, 2011 at 15:35 history answered Ben Webster CC BY-SA 3.0