Timeline for S-transformation of generalized Eisenstein series
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 12, 2011 at 7:25 | vote | accept | phoboid | ||
Dec 11, 2011 at 17:42 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 11, 2011 at 8:29 | comment | added | phoboid | @paul garrett: Sorry for being unclear, the $\sigma$'s are defined as $\sigma^{\psi,\phi}(n) = \sum_{m\mid n, m>0} \psi(n/m) \phi(m) m$, so it is basically a sum-of-divisors function weighted by the Dirichlet characters. | |
Dec 10, 2011 at 23:09 | comment | added | paul garrett | @phoboid: Perhaps the $\sigma^{\psi,\phi}$ notation is not universal... can it be explained briefly? This might enable further answers. | |
Dec 10, 2011 at 20:45 | comment | added | B R | Personally, I think it is difficult to understand how the Eisenstein series transforms using the $q$-expansion. If I were you (in the notation of D-S, Section 4.6), I'd be stuck with noting that $E_2^{\psi,\phi}$ is a multiple of $G_2^{\psi,\phi}$, which is a weighted sum of $G_2^{\bar v}$, which is the sum of two functions, $f^{\bar v}_2(\tau)$ and $G_2(\tau)/N$. Maybe someone else knows a smarter way. | |
Dec 10, 2011 at 18:58 | history | asked | phoboid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |