Skip to main content
Added a reference
Source Link
Alain Valette
  • 11.1k
  • 44
  • 62

Just a piece of information from the french side. Dieudonn'e, in ``La g'om'etrie des groupes classiques'' (Springer, 1970), takes the definition of a classical group for granted. But browsing through the table of contents, it's clear he means $GL_n(K),SL_n(K),O_n(K,f),U_n(K,f),Sp_{2n}(K)$ plus variants (e.g. the projectivized versions).

In the book ``Groupes de Lie classiques''(Hermann, 1986), R. Mneimn'e and F. Testard define classical Lie groups in their introduction: same list as in Dieudonn'e, but assuming of course $K=\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$.

Just a piece of information from the french side. Dieudonn'e, in ``La g'om'etrie des groupes classiques'' (Springer, 1970), takes the definition of a classical group for granted. But browsing through the table of contents, it's clear he means $GL_n(K),SL_n(K),O_n(K,f),U_n(K,f),Sp_{2n}(K)$ plus variants (e.g. the projectivized versions).

Just a piece of information from the french side. Dieudonn'e, in ``La g'om'etrie des groupes classiques'' (Springer, 1970), takes the definition of a classical group for granted. But browsing through the table of contents, it's clear he means $GL_n(K),SL_n(K),O_n(K,f),U_n(K,f),Sp_{2n}(K)$ plus variants (e.g. the projectivized versions).

In the book ``Groupes de Lie classiques''(Hermann, 1986), R. Mneimn'e and F. Testard define classical Lie groups in their introduction: same list as in Dieudonn'e, but assuming of course $K=\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$.

Source Link
Alain Valette
  • 11.1k
  • 44
  • 62

Just a piece of information from the french side. Dieudonn'e, in ``La g'om'etrie des groupes classiques'' (Springer, 1970), takes the definition of a classical group for granted. But browsing through the table of contents, it's clear he means $GL_n(K),SL_n(K),O_n(K,f),U_n(K,f),Sp_{2n}(K)$ plus variants (e.g. the projectivized versions).