Timeline for Holomorphic and antiholomorphic forms of projective space
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2009 at 0:22 | history | edited | Kevin H. Lin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Dec 10, 2009 at 20:40 | vote | accept | Jean Delinez | ||
| Dec 10, 2009 at 19:44 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 10, 2009 at 15:35 | vote | accept | Jean Delinez | ||
| Dec 10, 2009 at 20:40 | |||||
| Dec 10, 2009 at 15:34 | history | edited | Jean Delinez | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body; edited body
|
| Dec 10, 2009 at 15:34 | comment | added | Jean Delinez | You're quite right that's exactly what I meant. | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 17:08 | comment | added | David E Speyer | The bundle of holomorphic 1-forms (also known as the holomorphic cotangent bundle) on CP^1 is O(-2), not O(1). Its dual is the holomorphic tangent bundle to CP^1, which is O(2). I suspect you meant to ask about the holomorphic tangent and cotangent bundles, in which case Greg gave a very good description. You might want to edit your question to clarify, especially if you are looking for something else. | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 7:46 | answer | added | David Bar Moshe | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 2:31 | answer | added | Greg Kuperberg | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 1:00 | history | asked | Jean Delinez | CC BY-SA 2.5 |