Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 7, 2011 at 15:01 comment added monodromy In fact, unless I am missing something, I believe the answer to the question is yes, although not every real model of $E$ as above (which exists by the stability assumption on $\mathfrak{f}$) will work.
Dec 7, 2011 at 13:30 comment added Keerthi Madapusi There is the main Main theorem, which actually describes the action of the whole Galois group of $\mathbb{Q}$, though it seems a little excessive here. See Section 4 of jmilne.org/math/articles/2007c.pdf
Dec 7, 2011 at 8:16 comment added David Loeffler @monodromy: the Main Theorem of CM is a statement about automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$ which restrict to the identity on $K$, which complex conjugation does not.
Dec 6, 2011 at 23:31 comment added monodromy @David: Doesn't the statement in the if clause of the last sentence in your question follow from the Main Theorem of Complex Multiplication?
Dec 6, 2011 at 21:56 comment added David Loeffler @Dror: The j-invariant of any lattice invariant under complex conjugation is real, because the q-expansion coefficients of the j-invariant are in $\mathbb{R}$. One doesn't need the lattice to have CM for this to work.
Dec 6, 2011 at 21:49 comment added Dror Speiser Small comment: since the ideal is stable under complex conjugation, it is of order two in the class group. Reducing it, we get a reduced ambiguous ideal, which under the assumptions isn't above $2$ (or $1$). So it is of the form $(m,\sqrt{\Delta})$, with $m|\Delta$. Normalizing, the lattice is homothetic to $(1,\sqrt{\Delta}/m)$. Hence, by V.2.1 in [AECII], the j-invariant is real.
Dec 6, 2011 at 21:35 history edited David Loeffler CC BY-SA 3.0
trivial clarification
Dec 6, 2011 at 18:34 history asked David Loeffler CC BY-SA 3.0