Timeline for Hodge decomposition of a symplectic form.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2011 at 8:00 | vote | accept | Mirjana | ||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Mirjana | ||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 8:00 | |||||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Mirjana | ||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:56 | |||||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Mirjana | ||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:56 | |||||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:49 | vote | accept | Mirjana | ||
| Dec 18, 2011 at 7:56 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2011 at 0:31 | comment | added | Mirjana | I found the definition and the Hodge decomposition in this paper: Special complex manifolds, D.V Alekseevsky, V. Cortes, C. Devchand. And I get confused when I start to read the proof of Proposition 4. | |
| Dec 6, 2011 at 22:55 | comment | added | yael fregier | Thanks for the reference to Victor Guillemin's notes. I have taken a look, what I talked about corresponds to sections 4,5 and 8 of these notes (modulo taking duals). But he does more, in particular what I described was the linear version, whereas he also treats the global aspects in section 7. | |
| Dec 6, 2011 at 21:44 | history | edited | Spiro Karigiannis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 538 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2011 at 15:30 | history | answered | Spiro Karigiannis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |