Timeline for What's a nice argument that shows the volume of the unit ball in $\mathbb R^n$ approaches 0?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 20, 2022 at 14:34 | comment | added | user7427029 | @B.Bischof: \begin{align*} 2^n \left(2 \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}\right)^{n/2} &= 2^n 2^{n/2} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}^{n/2} \\ &= 2^{3n/2} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}^{n/2} \\ &= (2^3)^{n/2} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}^{n/2} \\ &= 8^{n/2} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}^{n/2} \\ &= \left(8 \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}\right)^{n/2} \\ &= \left(\sqrt{64} \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}\right)^{n/2} \\ \end{align*} | |
Aug 2, 2016 at 9:47 | comment | added | David Feldman | Alternatively one could observe that at most 4 coordinates have magnitude at least $\sqrt{1/5}$. Then one gets the volume estimate $$\left(\begin{array}{c} n\\4\end{array}\right) \left(\sqrt{4/5}\right)^{n-4}$$ so now you don't even have two exponentials to fight it out. | |
Jun 9, 2010 at 22:43 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | BTW, the software now makes it look like it was my argument. But it wasn't; it was contributed by fedya. | |
Jun 9, 2010 at 20:17 | history | edited | Randomblue | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
making it look even nicer; added 4 characters in body
|
Dec 10, 2009 at 17:39 | history | edited | Greg Kuperberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 16 characters in body
|
Dec 10, 2009 at 17:34 | history | edited | Greg Kuperberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 159 characters in body
|
Dec 9, 2009 at 17:01 | history | edited | Reid Barton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 24 characters in body
|
Dec 9, 2009 at 4:57 | comment | added | B. Bischof | Unfortunately, I do not see the last part of your argument, perhaps I am being dense. Could you explain how you conclude the volume is bounded by (128/n)^(n/4)? | |
Dec 9, 2009 at 2:33 | comment | added | Greg Kuperberg | A very nice argument! | |
Dec 9, 2009 at 1:14 | history | edited | Reid Barton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
fixed signs
|
Dec 9, 2009 at 0:13 | history | answered | fedja | CC BY-SA 2.5 |