Skip to main content
Post Undeleted by François G. Dorais
Post Locked by François G. Dorais
removed quote - http://meta.mathoverflow.net/discussion/1252
Source Link
François G. Dorais
  • 44.4k
  • 6
  • 150
  • 233

How come no-one has mentioned Bloch's reviewreview of Milne's "Étale cohomology" yet?

"In short, [étale cohomology] is a gal all the boys should be pursuing. If they're not (and they're not) perhaps it's because she's misunderstood, or more precisely because she's not understood at all. Enter the good doctor Milne with an impressive tome revealing all, including diagrams of her private parts."

http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.bams/1183548011

How come no-one has mentioned Bloch's review of Milne's "Étale cohomology" yet?

"In short, [étale cohomology] is a gal all the boys should be pursuing. If they're not (and they're not) perhaps it's because she's misunderstood, or more precisely because she's not understood at all. Enter the good doctor Milne with an impressive tome revealing all, including diagrams of her private parts."

http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.bams/1183548011

How come no-one has mentioned Bloch's review of Milne's "Étale cohomology" yet?

Post Deleted by François G. Dorais
Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
name
  • 1.3k
  • 9
  • 17

How come no-one has mentioned Bloch's review of Milne's "Étale cohomology" yet?

"In short, [étale cohomology] is a gal all the boys should be pursuing. If they're not (and they're not) perhaps it's because she's misunderstood, or more precisely because she's not understood at all. Enter the good doctor Milne with an impressive tome revealing all, including diagrams of her private parts."

http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.bams/1183548011