Timeline for Resubmitting a paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 0:55 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by François G. Dorais | ||
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:56 | comment | added | Jim Conant | I agree that any paper is a bonus. Also, looking at my second comment, I did point out that it's probably too late for the OP to change his or her mind anyway. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:48 | comment | added | Spiro Karigiannis | This is indeed very true. But for a graduate student looking for their first job, most have exactly 0 or 1 papers. Yes, some do get their first paper in Annals or Inventiones, but those are rare. Committees looking to hire a postdoc right out of grad school usually don't expect to see any papers, much less a brilliant paper, so having something published anywhere is a bonus. Of course, the story is completely different when you are looking for tenure-track jobs. Quality certainly counts more than quantity. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:39 | history | answered | Jim Conant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |