Timeline for Resubmitting a paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 at 14:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 13, 2019 at 11:15 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2019 at 0:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 21:49 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2017 at 14:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 24, 2017 at 17:13 | |||||
| Dec 15, 2011 at 9:28 | comment | added | JRN | I think the OP means this: math.stackexchange.com/questions/86776/… | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 19:44 | comment | added | user19688 | @Thierry: post-doctoral positions, in the UK. Somewhere between algebra and combinatorics. By the way...thanks to everyone for their helpful responses. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 19:36 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by user19688 | ||
| Dec 2, 2011 at 16:15 | answer | added | Thierry Zell | timeline score: 18 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 16:12 | answer | added | Pietro Majer | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 16:06 | comment | added | Thierry Zell | Oh, and I forgot: it also depends tremendously on which field of mathematics you're in. I get the feeling that average number of paper per year can vary at least 10 to 1 depending on the field. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 16:04 | comment | added | Thierry Zell | When considering job applications, how much emphasis do people actually put on where a person's papers have been published, as opposed to how many have been published? Unfortunately, there is pretty much no way to answer this question without having an idea of (1) What kind of job you are looking for (I'm assuming we're talking about academic jobs here, but even that is too vague) and (2) where in the world these jobs are. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 15:46 | answer | added | Alain Valette | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 15:26 | answer | added | Deane Yang | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 15:06 | comment | added | Henry Cohn | It's probably not a big deal, unless there's a large difference in prestige between the journals. If so, then your advisor could briefly address this in your letter of recommendation. For example, I was once asked to write a letter for someone who had published a paper in a much less prestigious journal than he could have. At one point in the letter, I made a comment like "It might seem strange that such a great paper appeared in journal X. I don't know why, perhaps modesty on the author's part, but I would have strongly recommended acceptance by the Annals if I had refereed it for them." | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 15:01 | answer | added | GH from MO | timeline score: 18 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:40 | answer | added | Spiro Karigiannis | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:39 | answer | added | Jim Conant | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:36 | history | asked | user19688 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |