Timeline for Getting nervous refereeing a paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2011 at 17:29 | comment | added | darij grinberg | It's a matter of (alleged) carelessness here; I wouldn't assume any intent of breaching the anonymity on the side of the OP. | |
| Dec 1, 2011 at 15:40 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Even if the single-blind refereeing process is stupid, accepting a refereeing request under a single-blind system with the intent of breaching the anonymity seems to be a recipe for getting people angry without making any real progress towards reforming the system. | |
| Dec 1, 2011 at 13:26 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | Many people believe that the single-blind refereeing process is stupid and just slows things down. I am not sure whether I agree or disagree. | |
| Dec 1, 2011 at 1:33 | history | answered | Jay Kangel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |