Skip to main content

Timeline for Getting nervous refereeing a paper

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 3, 2017 at 2:09 review Close votes
Dec 3, 2017 at 12:52
Oct 22, 2017 at 18:54 review Close votes
Oct 23, 2017 at 3:53
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Dec 16, 2011 at 12:17 answer added Ronnie Brown timeline score: 14
Dec 9, 2011 at 21:34 history edited Valerio Capraro CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 17 characters in body
Dec 2, 2011 at 13:08 history edited Valerio Capraro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 62 characters in body
Dec 1, 2011 at 15:41 history edited Valerio Capraro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Dec 1, 2011 at 15:26 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 38
Dec 1, 2011 at 10:29 history edited Valerio Capraro CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 171 characters in body
Dec 1, 2011 at 10:22 answer added Federico Poloni timeline score: 12
Dec 1, 2011 at 8:53 comment added Alireza Abdollahi @Valerio: If I were you, I wrote a report as you explained: Actually you have nicley categorised paper flaws into 4 levels according to yourself). Flow your own way to write a report; At the end of your report you should write your final decision of course. This must be well-motivated from your list of comments/corrections.
Dec 1, 2011 at 7:13 comment added Valerio Capraro Ben, of course it didn't offend.. as I told, my English is sometimes very weird :)
Dec 1, 2011 at 3:49 answer added Frank Thorne timeline score: 22
Dec 1, 2011 at 1:58 comment added Ben Webster By the way, I hope my rephrasing of the question didn't offend. I found the original version very hard to parse.
Dec 1, 2011 at 1:57 comment added user9072 @Valerio: just regarding the 'I don't know how to do'. I never asked anything, but I think just logging out/not being logged in before clicking on 'ask question' would basically work.
Dec 1, 2011 at 1:33 answer added Jay Kangel timeline score: 4
Dec 1, 2011 at 1:15 answer added Gerhard Paseman timeline score: 2
Dec 1, 2011 at 0:53 history edited Ben Webster CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Nov 30, 2011 at 23:40 comment added Tom Leinster Re 3, citing an entire book without specifying the precise location is common, though it shouldn't be.
Nov 30, 2011 at 23:38 answer added Boris Novikov timeline score: 19
Nov 30, 2011 at 23:29 comment added Valerio Capraro I don't think that author can recognize me by these infos, anyway, I think there is a way to put questions on MO anonymously, but I don't know how to do..
Nov 30, 2011 at 23:22 answer added Igor Rivin timeline score: 46
Nov 30, 2011 at 23:21 comment added Joël Nice question, but be careful: you're supposed to be anonymous. The author might recognize that you're talking in his paper if he reads mathoverflow.
Nov 30, 2011 at 23:04 history edited Valerio Capraro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body; added 3 characters in body
Nov 30, 2011 at 22:55 history asked Valerio Capraro CC BY-SA 3.0