Skip to main content
Fixed typos, added a tag
Source Link
David White
  • 30.3k
  • 9
  • 154
  • 250

Let $A, B, C$ be algebras. Suppose that the$D^b(A)$ (the bounded derived category of $A$ $D^b(A)$ admits) admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and $D^b(C)$.

Then, by a result of Alfred Wiedemann'paper 'onWiedemann's paper "On stratifications of derived module categories'categories," the algebra $A$ has a finite global dimension if and only if so are $B$ and $C$.

Now, suppose that the bounded derived categories of $A$ and $B$ are equivalent. By Rickard's result, $D^b(A)$ admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and 0. Hence, the global dimension is a derived invariant.

But, BGS's Koszul duality give an equivalent between the bounded derived categories of the symmetric algebra and the exterior algebra. ObviouselyObviously, their global dimension are quite different. So, what's the reason?

Let $A, B, C$ be algebras. Suppose that the bounded derived category of $A$ $D^b(A)$ admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and $D^b(C)$.

Then, by a result of Alfred Wiedemann'paper 'on stratifications of derived module categories', the algebra $A$ has a finite global dimension if and only if so are $B$ and $C$.

Now, suppose that the bounded derived categories of $A$ and $B$ are equivalent. By Rickard's result, $D^b(A)$ admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and 0. Hence, the global dimension is a derived invariant.

But, BGS's Koszul duality give an equivalent between the bounded derived categories of the symmetric algebra and the exterior algebra. Obviousely, their global dimension are quite different. So, what's the reason?

Let $A, B, C$ be algebras. Suppose that $D^b(A)$ (the bounded derived category of $A$) admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and $D^b(C)$.

Then, by a result of Alfred Wiedemann's paper "On stratifications of derived module categories," the algebra $A$ has a finite global dimension if and only if so are $B$ and $C$.

Now, suppose that the bounded derived categories of $A$ and $B$ are equivalent. By Rickard's result, $D^b(A)$ admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and 0. Hence, the global dimension is a derived invariant.

But, BGS's Koszul duality give an equivalent between the bounded derived categories of the symmetric algebra and the exterior algebra. Obviously, their global dimension are quite different. So, what's the reason?

added some tags
Link
Yemon Choi
  • 25.8k
  • 9
  • 69
  • 156
Source Link
C Zhu
  • 11
  • 1

Recollements and global dimension

Let $A, B, C$ be algebras. Suppose that the bounded derived category of $A$ $D^b(A)$ admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and $D^b(C)$.

Then, by a result of Alfred Wiedemann'paper 'on stratifications of derived module categories', the algebra $A$ has a finite global dimension if and only if so are $B$ and $C$.

Now, suppose that the bounded derived categories of $A$ and $B$ are equivalent. By Rickard's result, $D^b(A)$ admits a recollement relative to $D^b(B)$ and 0. Hence, the global dimension is a derived invariant.

But, BGS's Koszul duality give an equivalent between the bounded derived categories of the symmetric algebra and the exterior algebra. Obviousely, their global dimension are quite different. So, what's the reason?