Timeline for Elliptic Curves over F_1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 9, 2009 at 2:37 | comment | added | JBorger | CM stands for "complex multiplication". It's a theorem that the endomorphism ring of an elliptic curve over a field of characteristic 0 is either Z or a rank 2 subring of an imaginary quadratic field. In the second case, one says it has complex multiplication. The point is that in the CM case, H^1, which is always 2-dimensional, now has an action of a 2-dimensional algebra, over which it is therefore 1-dimensional. So the "motives" of CM elliptic curves are essentially abelian. So CM elliptic curves are similar in some ways to G_m. | |
Dec 9, 2009 at 1:38 | comment | added | Chris Schommer-Pries | Excuse my ignorance. What is a "CM elliptic curve"? | |
Dec 9, 2009 at 1:37 | vote | accept | Chris Schommer-Pries | ||
Dec 9, 2009 at 0:00 | comment | added | JBorger | Yes, in my point of view there is "an F_1" for every Dedekind domain with finite residue fields. The one w.r.t Z gives the deepest one, and no elliptic curves are defined over it. But if R is the ring of integers in an imaginary quadratic of class number 1 and discriminant D, and E is an elliptic curve over R[1/D] with complex multiplication, then this scheme descends to the version of F_1 w.r.t R[1/D]. Without the class number restriction, it's probably still true, but you'd have to take E over the Hilbert class field and view it as a (non geom connected) scheme over R[1/D]. | |
Dec 8, 2009 at 16:35 | history | answered | Felipe Voloch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |