Timeline for The "Dzhanibekov effect" - an exercise in mechanics or fiction? Explain mathematically a video from a space station
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
32 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26 at 1:21 | comment | added | evaristegd | @ScottMorrison , your link to Terry Tao's post is not working anymore. It now redirects to a Workspace blog post unrelated to math. | |
| Sep 15, 2023 at 18:08 | comment | added | Michael F | The effect is real, but you do realize that the second video obviously is CGI? | |
| Oct 19, 2021 at 17:17 | answer | added | Aksakal almost surely binary | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 18, 2021 at 12:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Sep 18, 2021 at 17:49 | |||||
| May 7, 2021 at 7:56 | comment | added | Jérôme JEAN-CHARLES | This video is clear and offers some intuition : youtube.com/watch?v=1VPfZ_XzisU | |
| Mar 11, 2021 at 3:23 | comment | added | KConrad | The video at your 2nd ("more striking") link is unavailable. A message says the video is now being blocked in my country (USA) on copyright grounds. | |
| Nov 19, 2019 at 18:38 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question has been bumped anyway)
|
| Nov 6, 2019 at 21:33 | history | protected | Yemon Choi | ||
| Oct 25, 2019 at 3:02 | comment | added | Tadashi | A beautiful video by prof. Ghrist illustrates the intermediate axis theorem: youtu.be/KG51EoCxt6Y | |
| Oct 3, 2019 at 15:46 | comment | added | user21349 | Marcos Cossarini's answer is IMO more elegant and far more readable and transparent than the accepted answer. I would urge people to upvote it. | |
| Oct 1, 2019 at 19:59 | answer | added | Dan Piponi | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 1, 2019 at 19:23 | answer | added | Arthur Baraov | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Sep 27, 2019 at 0:02 | history | bounty ended | Emilio Pisanty | ||
| S Sep 27, 2019 at 0:02 | history | notice removed | Emilio Pisanty | ||
| Sep 21, 2019 at 12:51 | vote | accept | Alexander Chervov | ||
| S Sep 19, 2019 at 17:34 | history | bounty started | Emilio Pisanty | ||
| S Sep 19, 2019 at 17:34 | history | notice added | Emilio Pisanty | Reward existing answer | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 22:25 | answer | added | Kostya_I | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 18:07 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | Related on physics.SE: Why does a cuboid spin stably around two axes but not the third? physics.stackexchange.com/q/34364/8563 | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 21:04 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | Terry Tao just wrote about this on google plus: plus.google.com/114134834346472219368/posts/e3GLg4Ki4dj | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 19:34 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | I'm already happier with the improved capitalization and the youtube address removed from the title. | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 18:51 | answer | added | Terry Tao | timeline score: 175 | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 17:05 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed title; edited title
|
| Nov 27, 2011 at 17:04 | comment | added | KConrad | That this is an instability effect is already noted in the second comment to the second video. (Feed into Google translate if you don't know Russian.) | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 16:56 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 27, 2011 at 13:43 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 41 | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 12:21 | comment | added | Suvrit | I'm waiting for someone to write out a nice, sorta self-sufficient answer explaining this wonderful phenomenon! | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 | comment | added | Alexander Chervov | Thanks Theo for kind words and advice ! What would you suggest ? I think that if I would see such title, than I would also think like you, but nevertheless I would open the question... But it may be a matter of person's spirit, may be others do not think like me and more "quite" title is more appropriate... What do You think ? Actually such thing always bothers when I am writting a paper, I am trying to put titles and section titles to be informative as much as I can... But I know that some colleagues prefer more "quite" (from my point more "dull") words.. | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 6:50 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | I think this question is a great one. Can I ask you to think about revising the title and introduction? When I skimmed over recent questions, on the first pass I thought this was spam — links in the title, a challenge to explain some physics, etc all trigger "likely spam" in my mind. | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 5:23 | answer | added | Marcos Cossarini | timeline score: 15 | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 22:31 | answer | added | Victor Dods | timeline score: 19 | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 20:04 | history | asked | Alexander Chervov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |