Timeline for What is a twisted modular operad?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2012 at 15:43 | answer | added | Dan Petersen | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 28, 2011 at 2:18 | answer | added | Daniel Moskovich | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 27, 2011 at 7:24 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | (Those reading the comments might also look over tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/1224/… .) | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 16:09 | comment | added | Jim Conant | A modular operad is basically an operad which you can plug into itself. The twisting is, I think, related to making the signs work out in the Feynman transform (graph complex). See GK's discussion on orientation. | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 15:32 | history | reopened |
Dan Petersen user6976 David E Speyer Joseph O'Rourke Kevin Walker |
||
| Nov 25, 2011 at 22:05 | history | closed |
Ryan Budney Will Jagy Andrés E. Caicedo Martin Brandenburg Andrew Stacey |
not a real question | |
| Nov 25, 2011 at 16:57 | comment | added | Daniel Moskovich | I rewrote the question. Is this what you meant? | |
| Nov 25, 2011 at 16:56 | history | edited | Daniel Moskovich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified the question
|
| Nov 25, 2011 at 7:51 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | The original paper of Getzler and Kapranov is not so easy to digest. You might prefer the treatment of the Feynman transform in Markl, Shnider and Stasheff's book; they basically do the exact same thing but they spell out some more details. | |
| Nov 25, 2011 at 5:45 | history | edited | Hao | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Nov 25, 2011 at 5:28 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | This question is very vague. I presume by 'its' you mean 'twisted modular operad'. Please see mathoverflow.net/howtoask for advice about how to ask a focused question. | |
| Nov 25, 2011 at 5:23 | history | asked | Hao | CC BY-SA 3.0 |