Timeline for Recovering a matrix instead of a vector
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2014 at 21:19 | comment | added | rodms | See epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/070697835 | |
| S Jun 5, 2014 at 21:18 | history | suggested | rodms | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Defined dimensions of vectors, ranked parameters of problem.
|
| Jun 5, 2014 at 21:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 5, 2014 at 21:18 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2011 at 7:25 | answer | added | Dirk | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 23, 2011 at 5:31 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | I'm not sure I agree with the assertion in the first sentence. It seems to depend strongly on the nature of corruption, and on the precision of measurements. | |
| Nov 23, 2011 at 3:00 | comment | added | Noah Stein | Isn't a matrix just a special case of a vector? That is, can't you "flatten" an $n\times n$ matrix into a vector in $\mathbb{R}^{n^2}$ and then solve the problem by the usual means? | |
| Nov 23, 2011 at 2:52 | history | asked | Richard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |