Timeline for a question about Gromov-Witten invariant
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2009 at 12:10 | history | edited | Kevin H. Lin |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 8, 2009 at 11:55 | answer | added | Paul Johnson | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 6:15 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | You're right. I was trying to point out that the way the question was worded didn't make any sense while trying to also be funny. I'm sorry, HYYY and Alberto. I didn't mean anything by it. | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 5:44 | history | edited | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Rewritten for grammar to clarify
|
| Dec 8, 2009 at 5:43 | answer | added | Charles Siegel | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 5:41 | comment | added | Alicia Garcia-Raboso | @fpqc: there are many non-native speakers of English in the site, myself included. Instead of making fun of people, you could suggest a way of rewriting it in a manner that is more correct. | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 5:40 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | fpqc, don't be a jerk. I'm sure you're aware that many mathematicians and grad students aren't native English speakers, cut them some slack. | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 4:06 | history | asked | HYYY | CC BY-SA 2.5 |