Timeline for Is the following construction of the 0-Hecke monoid (well) known?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2013 at 2:00 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | Why the down vote on this old question? | |
| Nov 10, 2012 at 22:28 | comment | added | Patricia Hersh | Following up on Alexander's comment, you might also find it interesting to take a look at work of A. Knutson and E. Miller on subword complexes where they study properties of the `Demazure product', which is exactly the 0-Hecke product. It also appears in work of Drew Armstrong on sorting orders and in work of mine on total positivity. I had given an answer along these lines, but decided it wasn't really an answer to your question to your question. | |
| Feb 2, 2012 at 22:26 | vote | accept | Benjamin Steinberg | ||
| Feb 2, 2012 at 21:11 | answer | added | Alexander Tiskin | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 24, 2011 at 0:50 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | @Alexander, thanks I will take a look. | |
| Nov 24, 2011 at 0:22 | comment | added | Alexander Woo | Since there hasn't been an answer yet - I'd just like to comment that I think it is likely that this is known, since I know of two different contexts where this might be a useful statement. Unfortunately, it may be buried as a lemma. I suggest trying Deodhar's papers on combinatorial aspects of Kazhdan--Lusztig elements/polynomials and the Kostant--Kumar papers on cohomology and K-theory of flag varieties. | |
| Nov 21, 2011 at 18:59 | history | asked | Benjamin Steinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |