Timeline for When is a colimit of a subcollection the same as the overall colimit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2011 at 18:54 | comment | added | Buschi Sergio | I edit my answere, mine was really a wrong consideration. | |
| Nov 21, 2011 at 18:45 | history | edited | Buschi Sergio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 194 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2011 at 18:33 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | "Too elementary" really is in the eye of the beholder, isn't it? I'd say the question is fine. MO is ready-made for mathematicians asking for confirmation on graduate-level proofs outside their domain of expertise. I'd also say that not noticing a chapter with the vague title of "special limits" would have especial bearing on one's question is quite forgivable. :-) | |
| Nov 21, 2011 at 18:28 | comment | added | topspin1617 | Yes, if you saw the comment I wrote already on the other answer, I already realized that the original question wasn't very difficult. I just didn't realize it when I asked. I was still curious about whether things like that could happen more generally, i.e. when a limit/colimit/etc of a subset of objects is enough to determine the same on the whole set, but I'm sorry if that's a silly thing to wonder about. | |
| Nov 21, 2011 at 16:46 | history | answered | Buschi Sergio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |