Timeline for "Sums-compact" objects = f.g. objects in categories of modules?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2011 at 20:51 | comment | added | Buschi Sergio | @David White. Thank you for notification. I Edit the answere and try to give a better answer. | |
| Nov 22, 2011 at 20:42 | history | edited | Buschi Sergio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Nov 22, 2011 at 17:50 | history | edited | Buschi Sergio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Nov 22, 2011 at 13:59 | comment | added | David White | Reading the OP's post, it seems he already knew all the implications and non-implications in your answer. What he wanted to know was whether sumpact implies finitely generated, not finitely presented. He already knew it couldn't imply finitely presented because sumpact is strictly weaker than compact (which is equivalent to finitely presented). Still, I hope you leave this answer up because it's nice to have the terminology from algebra all in one place. | |
| Nov 20, 2011 at 18:22 | history | edited | Buschi Sergio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2011 at 10:25 | history | answered | Buschi Sergio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |